Similar Searches

  • California Continues Data Protection Lead (April 20, 2010)

    Is California blazing yet another legal Data Protection trail? Information Week just posted a blog on California SB-1186 (not yet signed into law). It essentially adds more prescriptive granularity to the state’s existing SB-1386, which is more or

  • Understanding The New Massachusetts Data Protection Law (January 26, 2010)

    After months of defining, redefining, extending deadlines and planning, a new law in Massachusetts that affects all businesses that handle personal data of Massachusetts residents is finally about to go into effect. According to Massachusetts 201 CMR 17:"The objectives

  • European Data Protection Law a Possibility? (November 16, 2009)

    The Register recently reported that the European Commission is considering passing EU-wide laws on data breach notification, along the lines of those in place in the USA already. Viviane Reding, the Information Security Commissioner said: “The Telecoms Reform has put the

  • Mexico Passes Data Protection Law (July 22, 2010)

    While 45 of the 50 U.S. states have data breach notification laws on the books, many countries have no such protections. Earlier this month, Mexico joined the ranks of countries looking to provide legal assurances that its citizens’ privacy data

  • Oregon State Mistake Puts Personal Data at Risk (November 29, 2009)

    Sloppy handling of confidential records by a state agency in Salem, Oregon left people's names, Social Security numbers, ages and addresses exposed in an open recycling bin outdoors.The blunder by the

Related News

  • California Continues Data Protection Lead (April 20, 2010)

    Is California blazing yet another legal Data Protection trail? Information Week just posted a blog on California SB-1186 (not yet signed into law). It essentially adds more prescriptive granularity to the state’s existing SB-1386, which is more or

  • Understanding The New Massachusetts Data Protection Law (January 26, 2010)

    After months of defining, redefining, extending deadlines and planning, a new law in Massachusetts that affects all businesses that handle personal data of Massachusetts residents is finally about to go into effect. According to Massachusetts 201 CMR 17:"The objectives

  • European Data Protection Law a Possibility? (November 16, 2009)

    The Register recently reported that the European Commission is considering passing EU-wide laws on data breach notification, along the lines of those in place in the USA already. Viviane Reding, the Information Security Commissioner said: “The Telecoms Reform has put the

  • Mexico Passes Data Protection Law (July 22, 2010)

    While 45 of the 50 U.S. states have data breach notification laws on the books, many countries have no such protections. Earlier this month, Mexico joined the ranks of countries looking to provide legal assurances that its citizens’ privacy data

  • Oregon State Mistake Puts Personal Data at Risk (November 29, 2009)

    Sloppy handling of confidential records by a state agency in Salem, Oregon left people's names, Social Security numbers, ages and addresses exposed in an open recycling bin outdoors.The blunder by the

Missouri’s new Data Protection Disclosure Law

Although maybe unnoticed, a month ago Missouri finally joined that heady club called “states which have Data Privacy Laws.”On 28th August, the “Missouri Data Breach Notification Law,” or House Bill 62 took effect, not protecting, but at least enforcing care and attention of residents personal information (Social Security Numbers, Driver’s Licence Numbers, and information which could be used to access a residents financial accounts). Note I use the word “resident,” because, as with the other 47 or so state laws, this one applies to the Residents of Missouri, not to the businesses. If you have Missouri resident information in your datacenter in Timbuktu, you are still required (under civil and actual damages) to comply.The full text of the law can be found on the excellent HuschBlackwell site, but the interesting points are: This law applies to Personal Health Information (PHI) as well as Personally Identifiable Information (PII)The law applies to both “customer” data, as well as “employee” data – it basically applies to every resident of Missouri. If you loose more than 1000 individual records, you need to tell the Attorney General. Non compliance means civil damages. If you determine that the exposure of data is “unlikely” due to protective measures (or you believe the device was destroyed etc), you can elect not to disclose, but you MUST fully document the investigation and keep records for 5 Continue reading...


Write a Comment

Copyright © 2010 The Security Blog. All rights reserved.